core: Major refactor of admin endpoint and config handling

Fixed several bugs and made other improvements. All config changes are
now mediated by the global config state manager. It used to be that
initial configs given at startup weren't tracked, so you could start
caddy with --config caddy.json and then do a GET /config/ and it would
return null. That is fixed, along with several other general flow/API
enhancements, with more to come.

1 files changed, 86 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/admin_test.go b/admin_test.go
index 7fdac741e..e8563b716 100644
--- a/admin_test.go
+++ b/admin_test.go
@@ -15,14 +15,96 @@
 package caddy
 
 import (
-	"strings"
+	"encoding/json"
+	"reflect"
 	"testing"
 )
 
+func TestUnsyncedConfigAccess(t *testing.T) {
+	// each test is performed in sequence, so
+	// each change builds on the previous ones;
+	// the config is not reset between tests
+	for i, tc := range []struct {
+		method    string
+		path      string // rawConfigKey will be prepended
+		payload   string
+		expect    string // JSON representation of what the whole config is expected to be after the request
+		shouldErr bool
+	}{
+		{
+			method:  "POST",
+			path:    "",
+			payload: `{"foo": "bar", "list": ["a", "b", "c"]}`, // starting value
+			expect:  `{"foo": "bar", "list": ["a", "b", "c"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method:  "POST",
+			path:    "/foo",
+			payload: `"jet"`,
+			expect:  `{"foo": "jet", "list": ["a", "b", "c"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method:  "POST",
+			path:    "/bar",
+			payload: `{"aa": "bb", "qq": "zz"}`,
+			expect:  `{"foo": "jet", "bar": {"aa": "bb", "qq": "zz"}, "list": ["a", "b", "c"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method: "DELETE",
+			path:   "/bar/qq",
+			expect: `{"foo": "jet", "bar": {"aa": "bb"}, "list": ["a", "b", "c"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method:  "POST",
+			path:    "/list",
+			payload: `"e"`,
+			expect:  `{"foo": "jet", "bar": {"aa": "bb"}, "list": ["a", "b", "c", "e"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method:  "PUT",
+			path:    "/list/3",
+			payload: `"d"`,
+			expect:  `{"foo": "jet", "bar": {"aa": "bb"}, "list": ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method: "DELETE",
+			path:   "/list/3",
+			expect: `{"foo": "jet", "bar": {"aa": "bb"}, "list": ["a", "b", "c", "e"]}`,
+		},
+		{
+			method:  "PATCH",
+			path:    "/list/3",
+			payload: `"d"`,
+			expect:  `{"foo": "jet", "bar": {"aa": "bb"}, "list": ["a", "b", "c", "d"]}`,
+		},
+	} {
+		err := unsyncedConfigAccess(tc.method, rawConfigKey+tc.path, []byte(tc.payload), nil)
+
+		if tc.shouldErr && err == nil {
+			t.Fatalf("Test %d: Expected error return value, but got: %v", i, err)
+		}
+		if !tc.shouldErr && err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("Test %d: Should not have had error return value, but got: %v", i, err)
+		}
+
+		// decode the expected config so we can do a convenient DeepEqual
+		var expectedDecoded interface{}
+		err = json.Unmarshal([]byte(tc.expect), &expectedDecoded)
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("Test %d: Unmarshaling expected config: %v", i, err)
+		}
+
+		// make sure the resulting config is as we expect it
+		if !reflect.DeepEqual(rawCfg[rawConfigKey], expectedDecoded) {
+			t.Fatalf("Test %d:\nExpected:\n\t%#v\nActual:\n\t%#v",
+				i, expectedDecoded, rawCfg[rawConfigKey])
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 func BenchmarkLoad(b *testing.B) {
 	for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
-		r := strings.NewReader(`{
-			"testval": "Yippee!",
+		cfg := []byte(`{
 			"apps": {
 				"http": {
 					"servers": {
@@ -39,6 +121,6 @@ func BenchmarkLoad(b *testing.B) {
 			}
 		}
 		`)
-		Load(r)
+		Load(cfg, true)
 	}
 }