wasm: support ThinLTO

Using ThinLTO manages to optimize binaries quite significantly. The
exact amount varies a lot by program but it's about 10-15% usually.

Don't remove non-ThinLTO support yet. It would not surprise me if this
triggered some unintended side effect. Eventually, non-ThinLTO support
should be removed though.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/compileopts/config.go b/compileopts/config.go
index b22db15dc..499dcd27a 100644
--- a/compileopts/config.go
+++ b/compileopts/config.go
@@ -190,17 +190,11 @@ func (c *Config) StackSize() uint64 {
 	return c.Target.DefaultStackSize
 }
 
-// UseThinLTO returns whether ThinLTO should be used for the given target. Some
-// targets (such as wasm) are not yet supported.
-// We should try and remove as many exceptions as possible in the future, so
-// that this optimization can be applied in more places.
+// UseThinLTO returns whether ThinLTO should be used for the given target.
 func (c *Config) UseThinLTO() bool {
-	parts := strings.Split(c.Triple(), "-")
-	if parts[0] == "wasm32" {
-		// wasm-ld doesn't seem to support ThinLTO yet.
-		return false
-	}
-	// Other architectures support ThinLTO.
+	// All architectures support ThinLTO now. However, this code is kept for the
+	// time being in case there are regressions. The non-ThinLTO code support
+	// should be removed when it is proven to work reliably.
 	return true
 }